Centre for the New Europe logo (CNE)
What's New
June 2008 Monatsmagazin now online
Lichtenberg-Haahtela HTA transcript now online
Google-DoubleClick Merger transcript now online
Kobelt/De Wit RA transcript now online
CNE Welcomes Jeremy Nicholson as Fellow
CNE Welcomes Karen Horn as Fellow
Click here to browse the 2007 CNE Capitalist Ball photo gallery
Top Downloads
Ideal Matter
by Morris, et al
The Macro issues of the Microsoft Case
by Cass, Harfst, Kirchner, et al
Click here to browse the CNE Liberty Library
rue du luxembourg 23 brussels 1000 belgium +32 2 506 4000
CNE.org auf DeutschCNE.org en françaisCNE.org en españolCNE.org italiano
Search

HomeCNE PublicationsMonatsmagazinJournal of the New EuropeBrowse all CNE publicationsCNE EventsContact DetailsAbout CNELinksGo to the CNE Liberty Library PageClick to learn more about internships at CNECapitalist BallGo to th CNE Health web siteGo to the CNE Intellectual Property web siteGo to the CNE competition policy web siteClick here to go to the video page

Recent CNE Events

17 July 2008
Bill Emmott
BOOK LAUNCH of "Rivals: How the Power Struggle Between Chine, India and Japan will shape our next decade"

Date TBA
Brian Gazzard
Coping with HIV: The impact on EU health systems of a chronic disease

 

Today's Featured Blog Posting at CNE

posted by  Brian MicklethwaitSATs tests and giant nails
25 JUL 2008 – In Britain just now a huge political row is in progress about Britain's SATs tests. They were a shambles, with delays, ludicrous errors and inconsistencies, and all kinds of stories flying around of students, and worse, "cocktail waitresses", being drafted in at the last minute to do the marking. ETS is (see here) "recognised worldwide for the high quality of its products". Not in Britain. In Britain ETS is a laughing stock. And whatever chances Britain's education minister Ed Balls had of succeeding Gordon Brown as leader of whatever is about to remain of the Labour Party have likewise disappeared.

I remember when the idea of competitive tendering by businesses for government contracts was a brand new wheeze of free marketeering think tankers, back in the days of Margaret Thatcher. Competition would, said the think tankers, drive down prices. And I'm sure that it often did. But this ETS SATs fiasco illustrates the downside of such arrangements. Maybe ETS were the most "competitive" bidders. But any way you slice it, this was still a government decision, no different in principle from a decision to pay the wages of some newly hired civil servants. Would an individual spending his own money have been so careless with £156 million? Would a company that made a decision like this suffer as little as governments suffer when they cock things up? I have even encountered the suggestion that the EU compelled the government to accept the lowest bid, although my understanding of British officialdom is that it often uses the EU as an excuse for decisions that are actually its own.
READ MORE at CNEcompetition.ORG >>>

On CNE's other sites

Intellectual Property
David Carr: Google bites back

Brian Micklethwait: Copying the architects and copying the structural engineers

Einar Du Rietz: Whose Reputation is It?

Competition
Einar Du Rietz: Free Phone - No Phone - Phone Home

Brian Micklethwait: SATs tests and giant nails

Dalibor Rohac: German labour market still closed to EU newcomers

Gabriel Calzada: The interventionist crisis: we also need competition in money and banking

Alberto Mingardi: Sarkozy and the Dilemma of the European Right

Health
Jacob Arfwedson: The devil may (Medi)care

Anders Sandberg: Binding Heavy Metal Fears

Petra Orogvanyiova: Do we need bottled water?

Stephen Pollard: NHS tide turning

 

 
©2007 Centre for the New Europe AISBL